index
index
Numerics
Number Meaning
Numerical Entanglement


RulerBarBlu.gif, 4 kB Pictographic to cuneiform script (pictographs to syllabograms) evolved to phonetic characters and then to "spelling out" of words at about 1500BC in Palestine. (Aramaic alphabet) Simplification began with assigning phonetic values to already established hieroglyphs.
Pictograms already represented whole words.
What evolved was a whole pictogram could stand for the sound of the first letter of it's word.
For example, the Semitic name for an ox was "Aleph"; Therefor the hieroglyph for Aleph became the sound-of-"A.": a character. A phonetic character!
The Semitic name for a tent or dwelling was "Beth". And so the hieroglyph for Beth became the character for the sound of "B."
This process continued until a series of 22 pictograms had been chosen to represent 22 essential sounds in the spoken language.
The spoken language took precedence. The written language yielded to the spoken language (except for vowels). Aural traditions extracted implicit vowels (not seen or written). Huge spelling problems developed with words that sounded the same (puns).
Masiliana700BC.gif, 5 kB
26 Character Masiliana 700BC

Vaksalastenen.jpg, 41 kB
24 Character runic AD
Superstition surrounds most early alphabets. For example, the 24 runes of the runic alphabet attributed each character with a divinatory sense and a magical power.
And to complicate things further, numbers and letters were synonymous - where ages ago - one ment the other.

RulerBarBlu.gif, 4 kB
HebrewAlpha.gif, 17 kB HebrewNumerals.gif, 23 kB
Hebrew: 22 Letters, 27 numerical Characters
Hebrew: Alpha characters are the same as numerical characters.

BballAll.gif, 5 kB Alphabets:

Mathematical operations can easily be employed with numbers.
Of course, Numbers lend themselves to this aim. Numerics facilitate a logical method for products, combinations and permutations of these mystical characters. A Mystical property performed double duty, not just communication. There was utter reverence to the written word. Ages ago, The twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet were the breath of God and produced an idealized world: a vision of the world. The world later to be congealed and formed. Mere Mystical characters had powers in a real existence and physical development. By means of these elements the actual (physical) creation of the world took place. (See the section on what my father taught me, concerning evolution and entropy.)
"22Letters... God drew them, hewed them, combined them, weighed them, interchanged them, and through them produced the whole creation and everything that is destined to come into being" (Hebrew Book Sefirot ii. 2).
RulerBarBlu.gif, 4 kB Phoenicians did not use the letters of their alphabet for purposes of numeration.
The Greeks, who derived their alphabet from them, did so in the 5th century BC.
Greek alphabet consists of nine mutes, eight semivowels, and seven vowels. All with numerical counterparts.
Greek arithmetical notation: eight letters are used to denote units, eight tens, and eight hundreds: total 888


RulerBarBlu.gif, 4 kB The Greek alphabet shared the numerical corelation of the Hebrews, but not so much the special character inspiration of which the Hebrews felt so privileged. Mysteriously, special inspiration still permeated the Greek language, undiminished. Why did this property transcend the language? The specific language must be immaterial! It is all in the Numbers!


Numbers fall into four catagories of usage. RulerBarBlu.gif, 4 kB

Sheep3.gif, 6 kB BBALLBLU.GIF, 0 kB Numerative, Enumeration, Ordinal:
As in Counting using Order.
As in Placement and Rank.
As in Position; signifying Location.
As used in mathematical indexing.
(Usual use is of integers only.)


BBALLBLU.GIF, 0 kB Quantify, Cardinality:
As in Scientific Measuring.
As used in mathematical formulas, relations, and equations.
As used as continuous values of abstract quantities or notions.
(Analog measurements can be obtained by digital enumeration or counting, and represent an area between enumeration and natural measurement.)


RaceCareArnhardt3.gif, 7 kB BBALLBLU.GIF, 0 kB Label:
As on the doors of race cars.
As in naming a runner.
As Bar Codes.
(Numerals do not - in any way - have to be faithful reproductions.
Nor do they have to pertain to any specific base. For example base 2 binary.)


Footprints3InSand.gif, 7 kB BBALLBLU.GIF, 0 kB Meaning:
BANAST15.gif, 1 kB Innate Significance
As in Personality
As in to "paint" a number with special significance,
As in to attribute additional attributes.


This last category is the oldest in human history,
but for me is the newest in terms of acknowledgement and understanding.
I have conceived a way to span dimensions: Entanglement. Entanglement is a new concept to physics, but has been known in reality from ancient times. It was known in numbers.

Is there communication structure with numerical entanglement, such as with grammatical nouns and verbs?
Is there evidence of modifiable meaning, something similar as adjectives and adverbs?
The whole arena is highly charged with vague probabalistic mathematical relations, and none of it concrete.
There are no mathematical disciplines that can even describe it. I propose that numbers that our biological brains can understand, can ALSO be written in a vector format. Somehow in this vector format, numbers can operate on one another in hidden dimensions. The numbers that we can imagine are only the tip of a larger iceberg number. These numbers are almost intrinsically alive, and can not be analysed by modern mathematics or computers. Besides the chess pieces, or numbers, belonging to a larger class, the board itself needs to be updated. Today, every number can be represented in a plane, with a real and imaginary component. I propose that the playing field, for this abstract concept of numbers, has even more dimensions than these two. And, further, that at least one is not whole, a fractional dimension, as is seen in fractals.

I was introduced to the concept of hidden numerical meaning when I was a young boy by a book of Del Washburn and Jerry Lucas. At the time, I considered the work too complicated and too "mystical". I must give credit to these two men as my mentors.

RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB Also, before I begin, I should mention that ancients numbered the planets in the solar system differently than today. And in general, it is my opinion that life before humans also numbered the planets as the ancients.

Here is my opinion:
For an example in numbering... Consider a massive binary star system.
A hypothetical Sun number 1 has a planet in orbit.
Assume Sun number 1 is less massive than Sun number 2.
The combined mass of Sun-1 plus the mass of its planet is greater that the mass of Sun-2.
Now for the criteria!...
The orbit of Sun-1 about the epicenter is less than the orbit of Sun-2.
Therefore Sun-1 is number "One".
This is the criteria for numbering before humans: the radius!

Now for us...
The suns radius or "wabble" is the smallest; at always less than about a few hundred thousand miles.
The next object out is Mercury, representing number "Two". ...and so on.

Therefore, here is the numbering for our solar system according to radius:
1) Sun
2) Mercury
3) Venus
4) Earth
5) Mars
6) Jupiter
7) Saturn
8) Uranus
As you can see, the planets are numbered differently than this today. (Today, Mercury is number "One".) This was the "implied" order of "something" in folklore and before cuneiform writing. Other numbering systems are theoretically possible: such as Velocity or Mass, but I don,t believe these are substantiated in folklore. The combination of velocity and mass together give the Radius, and it is quite "visual" being viewed from many parsecs away. RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB
BANAST15.gif, 1 kB Events, a preface to numbers

RulerBarBlu.gif, 4 kB
1 One   2 Two   3 Three   4 Four   5 Five   6 Six   7 Seven   8 Eight   9 Nine   10 Ten  
11 Eleven   12 Twelve   13 Thirteen   14 Fourteen   15 Fifteen   20 Twenty  
22 TwentyTwo   23 TwentyThree   40 Forty   42 FortyTwo   46 FortySix   50 Fifty  
60 Sixty   70 Seventy   90 Ninety  
111 OneHundredEleven  
122 OneHundredTwentyTwo   150 OneHundredFifty   153 OneHundredFiftyThree   169 OneHundredSixtyNine   180 OneHundredEighty   250 TwoHundredFifty   276 TwoHundredSeventySix   666 SixHundredSixtySix   1290   RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB
My science friends have all said in assorted like words to these: "I wish to see the face of God."
And no dought beautiful unification equations stand taller and taller, and are getting closer to this aim. They are making ever bolder promises.

My proud and infallible science is second to none, for it is the basis for all that is known by the new modern man. It haughtily transports me around a bend, and dares to address and point toward God. As a man of physics and science, I know that this is a serious mistake.
(Judges 13:22) "We are doomed to die!" he said to his wife. "We have seen God!"
(Deuteronomy 18:16) "Let us not hear the voice of the LORD our God nor see this great fire anymore, or we will die."
(Exodus 33:20) "You cannot see my face, for no one may see Me and live."
(Isaiah 45:9) Does the clay say to the potter, 'What are you making?

But then again, perhaps my friends and theologians are right: "Our eyes will be opened!"
In fact, with such powerful tools and understanding, we will be as gods! We will not surely die. We will not die anymore, and we will figure out how to live forever. Who could tell us otherwise? It is just around the corner, you know. And there is no need to worry...

RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB I wrote a program on my computer to display dots of random colors. The dots represent random numbers. The dots may also represent random events. Idealy there will be no patterns.
Before I tell you were I am going with this, indulge me to digress a little...


RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB SterioFlow1990.jpg, 4 kB In 1990 I made stereoscopic pictures, by using an ordinary camera. First by taking a picture; then displacing the camera left or right about three inches (the distance of human eyes) and taking another picture. I developed my own viewer to see the two slides. The viewer was at the reception desk of KHSL for visitors to see while they waited. My viewer was held together with rubber bands, and people would have to face the sun-filled window to see beautiful 3-D screens. Slides are so vivid and realistic when compared to pictures. When combined with the 3-D effect it is no wonder that guests were fascinated. To visitors, they were just pretty screens. But to me, there was more.
RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB SterioScopic1990.jpg, 28 kB I then wrote a computer program to display stereoscopic effects using ONE picture...
There is no viewing apparatus. And this of course is viewed by focusing at a distance closer than the picture.
Actually the focal point of each eye is still exactly on a picture, it is just not the same picture.
RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB RandomEvents.jpg, 42 kB OK, getting back to random numbers...
In a field of random events, take notice of an arbitrary group of events (pixels). The group is composed of random events that came from a field of random events. Then copy the group of random events to the right.
This is how I made stereoscopic pictures of "invisible" random patterns.
3D-Image1.gif, 42 kB Visually superimpose the two squares by crossing your eyes. You will see a third square that is closer to you. Without loosing focus, carefully notice the larger section below. And now see the "hidden" events. (It happens to be another square, but I could have made it bicycles or trees or anything.) What your eyes can not see, your brain CAN see. The very act of consciously noticing or selecting random events changes them in your brain. Making the events no longer "random". In this simple example a computer can easily detect this, just as the human brain does. A larger computer can detect more complex mappings and transformations: Something commensurate with daily events. Such anomalies would not be "inspirational". They would be necessarily logical in a statistical sence.

This whole section on numbers is of the inspirational type, and is outside the normal realm of scientific study. Science only deals with the Past and the Future, and neither exists in Super Reality. Both are only contrivances of the human brain, or a machine. And what is worse, mathematical equations generally do not indicate Time, or progression of events, or Entropy. But there are places where time does not exists, such as with Black Holes and subatomic collisions. There is no Past or Future here. There waits an observer to "Materialize" something. Once something is observed, it now has a history and a past and a place. And with equations it has a Future too.


It was such a simple thing in the front lobby of KHSL-TV: Two plastic viewers tied together with a rubber band. Visitors could see stereoscopic views of my plants, and random dots that were not random. And when I would see visitors marveling at my pretty pictures, I knew inside that they did not see what I saw. What they saw was Broadcasting and trivial sights and sounds. What I saw was a strange fact: that an observer can create something.




RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB Sense an observer can influence things, I fear there may be some liability here...


I truly hate metaphysical crap.
Perhaps; just perhaps... The events are subjective to a conscious viewer.
The viewer can impart inspiration upon the events.
Just by being viewed!
In the example above, You did not have to move the group of random pixels. You only had to notice them. You did not have to circle them with a pencil, you only had to specify them in your mind. As long as there is an alternate representation in your brain - they are forever physically different. It is not easy to determine what random events changes what. For example a traveler may take notice of water in an oasis as a choice. Or the water in the oasis (more appropriately the sight of water) may cause changes in the brain of the traveler. It does not matter which is which: Conciousness of an event will change that event.

BANASTAR.gif, 1 kB Conciousness of an event will change that event!


RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB

DeerImag.jpg, 35 kB
I wish I had been given a parable to help understand this notion of mine...

A parable is an earthly story that has a heavenly meaning. Parables have an immediate placement in one plane and have a "shadow" or meaning in another. Parables are a means for people to understand unseen realms. Parallels and parables transcend many levels, and it is my contention here, that they are majestic ways that God can communicate with us.


Swans.jpg, 6 kB
We stand in the shadow of a Great Creator; We are images of something Else.
RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB
TibitImage.jpg, 38 kB
Our consciousness affects other planes of which we are not aware.
Here is why:

Our physical world necessarily yields an extremely limited perspective. We are genetically programed to live in a world of only a few needed dimensions. Nature harshly dictates that we need to smell, see, touch, and so on.
If not - we die! And no longer exist.

And our brains need to model in the three spatial dimensions. We know these dimensions on such a overwhelming personal and intimate level.
If not - we die!

Evolution waists nothing. Evolution demands: "Use it, or loose it!"
We are imprisoned: If we don't need it for survival or reproduction, then, sadly, we do not have it.

There is so much more out there, and we can not see it. (At least we can not see it with our two round eyeballs.)
RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB
MadeFromPlants.jpg, 61 kB
Negative Entropy in the World of Plants...
(Negative Entropy is "order".)

The plants in this picture did not "naturally" grow that way.
And the plants themselves have no knowledge of their "arrangement". Even if the plants could be like people and have instruments of incredible precision. And could know the exact placement of every plant down to the millimeter. And know the exact time that a gardener came and planted each to the millisecond. Still, they will not pursive of the higher order!

I propose that this scene is duplicated around us everyday - as if WE are the plants! We are talking about - literally - another world.

In this world, all we have is Entropy (disorder). At present, the meager understandings of Entropy is very shallow. The true forces behind the scenes of Entropy are barely registered in the consciousness of most humans, and consequently, are neglected in scientific study. Rain falls and things rot. We are so used to it; so why question it? Even our ancient ancestors had a better feel for it.

A good scientist, if he is doing his job correctly, will ignore coincidences that are not duplicable. This is the montra of science. But such restrictions can be like blinders on a horse.
Getting back to the picture...
There are no plants in existence that have "no-reason" for their being, biologically speaking. And yet - none without a "higher" beauty in another realm; A realm of conciousness. The evolution of plants is Easily seen with our analytical eyes. And has great technical precision. But the inspiration that uses and works through evolution is not, and can not be measured.
Perhaps that is the problem:
It can not be seen through the eyes, but only by FIRST seeing through the heart. If the heart is used, then the physical eyes can see clearly.

Great men have wrestled with this - and failed. Einstein said that "God did not play with dice."
But he was wrong, God DOES play with dice!

Sir Issac Newton played with magic numbers - and also probably failed.
...And still, with all these failures, they remain my heros.

I love this emotionally charged picture; I can not stop talking about it...

ANASTAR5.gif, 1 kB Jeremiah 9:
Oh, that my head were a spring of water and my eyes a fountain of tears!
I would weep day and night for the slain of my people.

RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB
EyeOfBeholder.jpg, 14 kB "Many people pilgrimage to Uluru, but what is seen there often depends on where you've come from." (Copyright - Robert Spanring)
Many people pilgrimage to Uluru, but what is seen there often depends on where you've come from. (Copyright Robert Spanring, National Geographic )

RULERMAR.GIF, 1 kB I may have to come back and modify this page because, for now, I must get on with the many pages that follow. They alone will dictate the content on the immediate page; the later forming the former. It is an adventure for me too.

Not that the adventure is without perils...
Many passages of the bible warning of:
False Visions, Divinations, and Delusions of ones own mind.

To be continued...
RULERBOW